Acharya Prashant addresses the question of how to make decisions from a state of ignorance, particularly regarding the virtue of patience. He challenges the idea of tolerating a situation or repeating a mistake indefinitely in the name of patience, asking, "How long and how many times do you want to just keep tolerating in your life in the name of patience?" He emphasizes that this is a subjective matter where one must honestly determine if they are genuinely experimenting or merely repeating a habit due to internal hypocrisy. The speaker asserts that any process of experimentation is bound by the constraints of a limited human lifespan. The goal is to be liberated as soon as possible within one's existence, not to engage in a process that could last thousands of years. He notes that people do not commit new mistakes but rather "recycled versions" of ones they have made a thousand times before. The pertinent question, therefore, is whether one has the choice to learn better and faster, rather than continuously forgiving oneself for repeated failures under the guise of experimentation and patience. Acharya Prashant clarifies that the goal is not to reach an imagined concept of enlightenment but to cultivate an "active disgust towards one's own bonded condition." The focus should be on the present reality of suffering, the constant buzz in the head, and the feeling of limitation, and developing an urgency to end it. This warmth and urgency are crucial. He redefines patience in the context of liberation, distinguishing between two types. False patience is sticking to a failing experiment out of habit or comfort. True patience, however, is the perseverance to continue trying even after failing a thousand times. It is not about clinging to one failing method but about remaining committed to the ultimate goal of liberation. Ultimately, one must honestly decide which kind of patience they are choosing to practice.