In response to a question about why people, especially traditional ones, focus on personal details rather than his teachings, Acharya Prashant explains that this is not a new phenomenon. He states that people are not concerned with the real thing, which is knowledge. He cites Kabir Saheb's couplet, "Do not ask the caste of a sage, ask for knowledge," explaining that it was necessary because people have always been more interested in a sage's identity than their wisdom. He applies this to his own situation, where people ask about his caste, his guru, or his marital status. He notes that those who attack him often highlight his surname, Tripathi, to imply a Brahminical agenda. He clarifies that in the sense they understand 'Brahmin,' he is not one, and consequently, they are not 'Dalits' in that context either. Acharya Prashant emphasizes that the message is more important than the messenger. He uses the analogy of being in a burning building: if someone wakes you up, you don't ask for their license or tradition; you escape the fire. He sees his role as simply waking people up from the burning house of their conditioned existence. He asserts that to speak on the Gita and Vedanta, he does not need to belong to any particular community or have any title attached to his name. He mentions that he adopted the title 'Acharya' (teacher) only because people found 'Sir' odd, and now he regrets it because people read too much into it. He advises the questioner not to waste time on those who are not ready or willing to listen, as this knowledge is precious and requires eligibility. He explains that he filters applicants for his sessions to maintain a conducive environment. He tells the questioner not to act as a middleman; if people are truly interested, they can access the thousands of free videos available. The root of the questioner's problem, he suggests, is their attachment to their own people and the desire for their validation. This desire stems from the difficulty of accepting that one's past life and relationships were not right. He concludes that the only thing that can truly influence others is a transformed life; when people see a genuine change in the questioner, they will be compelled to think.