Acharya Prashant explains that everything has value, including atheism. He shares a story where a master suggests that if one is in deep prayer and someone needs help, one must forget the prayer and God to help the person. This is because God, for most, is a concept, while the person in need is a fact; a fact must always be placed higher than a concept. He argues that being an atheist often means not believing in the concept of God, whereas being religious often means merely believing in that concept. In this sense, all mystics are atheists because they do not believe in any concepts. He notes that the Upanishads, by stating that God is unknowable, are actually works in atheism or agnosticism, as they negate the ability to define or know God through the mind. Acharya Prashant asserts that real godliness is found only by those who have cleansed their minds of all concepts, including the concept of God. He describes this as the process of 'Neti-Neti' or total negation. He distinguishes between the popular definition of atheism—which is a belief that there is no God—and true atheism, which is a total disbelief in any concept. He suggests that one must first be an atheist in this sense to be truly religious, as borrowed religiousness is not one's own. He highlights that mystic experiences across different religions are the same because they go beyond formal religion and concepts. Referring to Bhagat Singh, Acharya Prashant explains that his declaration of atheism was actually a sign of being deeply religious. He suggests that Bhagat Singh was frustrated with religion because it often acts as a wall rather than a bridge between man and God. He emphasizes that God is not a belief, and therefore one should boldly say they do not believe in any God. He concludes by interpreting Bhagat Singh's actions, such as throwing a bomb, as his own form of worship, which the conventional mind or the jailer could not understand. To a mystic or a revolutionary like Bhagat Singh, his entire life and sacrifice were his worship.