Acharya Prashant compares J. Krishnamurti to a highly skilled batsman playing under immense pressure when the team's score is forty runs for eight wickets. He explains that Krishnamurti could not express himself freely because of the prevailing conditions of his time, characterized by hypocrisy, poverty, superstition, and the misuse of God's name. To prevent his words from being weaponized by fraudulent people, Krishnamurti often chose to remain silent or say he did not know when asked about God. He rejected the necessity of a Guru because, during his era, the vast majority of self-proclaimed gurus were deceptive, and he did not want to validate their businesses. Acharya Prashant further illustrates that the language of saints changes according to the needs of their time. While Kabir Saheb could praise the importance of a Guru because he was surrounded by genuine spiritual figures like Raidas and Dadu Dayal, Krishnamurti faced a different reality. Similarly, while Sage Yajnavalkya emphasized the Soul, Buddha had to speak of 'no-soul' because the original teachings had become corrupted by his time. This negation is not an opposition to truth but a necessary response to the filth and falsehood prevalent in society. Saints often use the language of denial and negation to steer people away from wrong paths when hypocrisy is widespread.