Acharya Prashant responds to a young man whose marriage proposal was rejected by his girlfriend's parents due to his lower caste. He begins by sarcastically questioning why the man proposed to the girl's mother or father, highlighting the absurdity of letting parents' decisions override the couple's. He metaphorically describes the girl as "two-timing"—loving the man but ultimately obeying her parents, thus questioning the strength and foundation of their love. Acharya Prashant then challenges the questioner's own self-perception, asking why he identifies himself as being from a "lower society." He points out that this is a form of internalized discrimination and that no society is inherently high or low. He criticizes the superficial nature of their relationship, suggesting it is based on trivialities rather than deep understanding. He advises that a love divided in fifty directions will inevitably lead to deception. He encourages the young man to first enrich his own life by going to the gym, building his body, traveling the world, and meeting diverse people, suggesting that at 24, he should explore life for at least another 20 years before considering marriage. He emphasizes that while one should not harbor hatred or resort to violence, certain matters of dignity should not be tolerated. He uses the example of the sage Ashtavakra, who, despite being physically deformed, confronted those who laughed at him by calling them "merchants of skin." This story illustrates that one should not be defined by birth or body and must stand up for one's dignity. He tells the questioner that he is saved from a girl who would even present such a caste-based argument from her parents. Quoting Kabir Saheb, "It's good that my pot broke, I am now free from the task of filling water," he calls the breakup a blessing in disguise. He concludes that before entering a relationship, one should have deeper conversations about life and understanding. He states that if one is to love, that love must have strength. He advises the questioner to understand that he is not at fault, but neither is the girl, as she is a product of her conditioning. He suggests that the man should have tested the girl's understanding of such matters before getting into a relationship.