Acharya Prashant explains that the happiness found in hell is the lowest, most polluted, diluted, and corrupted kind of happiness, which is no happiness at all. He states that the motivation for a spiritual person to rise higher is the genuine desire to be truly happy. Therefore, they give up the place of corrupted happiness to venture out and rise high. Those on the spiritual path must take special care to be happy and must reclaim the concept of happiness. Otherwise, they are letting happiness go to the dogs, allowing people who have no right to be happy to monopolize and misuse the word. The speaker paradoxically notes that hell has become a very happy place, where all the happy ones and happy hours are found, while heaven is perceived as a dry place. This is because all the laughing and giggling people are found in hell. He refutes the notion that interesting people are found in hell, clarifying that they are not interesting but sick. The very definition of words like 'interesting,' 'happy,' and 'smart' has been distorted to their advantage. People in hell are as interesting as a stinking pile of trash, which is only interesting to crows and dogs. He questions why one should accept this distorted definition and urges the reclaiming of these words. For instance, a Buddha or a Mahavira should be called smart, not 'nonsensical beefcakes.' By abandoning these positive words to the 'creatures of hell,' we have created trouble for ourselves. This distortion has led to a situation where if a spiritual person is found to be genuinely pleased, radiant, and happy, people doubt their spirituality. The common expectation is that a spiritual person should be gloomy, dull, and de-facto dead. The speaker asserts that it is a spiritual person's dharma (responsibility) to be truly happy. If one is not really happy, they will seek happiness, and that search will inevitably lead them to hell. The only way to avoid hell-like happiness is to create heaven-like happiness for oneself. This means seeking a higher quality of happiness, not just a higher degree. It is a spiritual responsibility to not starve oneself of happiness; if one gives up on lower happiness, they must provide themselves with higher happiness.