Acharya Prashant responds to a question about the social custom where women leave their parental homes after marriage. He counters by asking the questioner, as a woman, why she would pose this question to anyone else, as it is her own life. He points out that no one is forcibly carrying women away; they walk out on their own, even if they are weeping. He questions the necessity of this act, stating that if he were a woman, he would never see the point in it or agree to it. He finds it absurd that a woman's parental home becomes a stranger's place, and she starts calling a random man 'papa' (father). Acharya Prashant dismisses this practice as having no divine basis, describing it as "loveless economics." He explains that the woman is viewed as a "factor of production" for manpower, i.e., babies. The husband, as the owner of this productive resource, wants to possess her and keep her in his premises. This is also why a woman is made to take her husband's name, similar to how old utensils in villages are etched with the owner's name. He calls this entire system nonsensical, loveless, and sad, asserting that no self-respecting or self-aware woman should agree to it. He adds that even a self-aware man would not want his wife to quit her family and home. Addressing a follow-up question about horoscope matching, Acharya Prashant states that it is not scientific. He argues that love does not care for the future, whereas a horoscope only talks about the future. Therefore, where there is horoscope matching, there cannot be any love. He concludes that getting into such a loveless relationship, even if the horoscopes match, leads to a wasted life. He advises that if a woman's parents do not want to keep her, she should find her own place, live freely, and do the right work, rather than being bound by such customs.