Acharya Prashant addresses a question about the immensity of the ocean he uses as a metaphor. He explains that the moment the ocean is a thought, it cannot be immense at all. The speaker clarifies that he mentioned the ocean as a dualistic image pointing towards non-duality. The intention was for the listener to use this dualistic image to enter non-duality and then discard the image of the ocean. However, the listener latches onto the dualistic image, forgetting what it was pointing towards, which leads to the question about the ocean's actual size. The speaker states that if the ocean is a matter of thought, it certainly will not be immense. This is how suspicion and doubts grow. He explains that what appears absolutely clear and certain in his presence starts appearing nebulous once the person is outside that environment. This happens because there is a certain flow in the session that is so strong it outspaces thought. When this flow stops, the flow of thought resumes, and doubts arise, such as concluding that the speaker was mistaken because a literal ocean is not infinite. Acharya Prashant questions whether he was talking about literal oceans, rhetorically asking if he is a sailor or what his interest is in oceans. He points out the core error: "God is forgotten, water is remembered." He warns about the danger inherent in sticking to words, quoting someone, or remembering their language without understanding the essence. He contrasts this with a subject like chemistry, where precise language is vital. In the spiritual context, he explains, language is secondary, like the vehicle that brings you to a destination. One must not keep sitting on the vehicle after arriving.