Acharya Prashant explains that the time parents, especially mothers, spend on a child is not a favor but a matter of justice. He states that parents owe it to the child, who is justified in asking if they ever pleaded to be brought into this world. The speaker posits that parents, in a moment of personal wisdom, planned indiscretion, or unplanned lust, gave birth. Consequently, the child can metaphorically sue them and demand damages. All the money spent on the child, such as school fees, is described as compensation or a fine for that moment of indiscretion. Parents are being penalized by existence; for instance, the mother carrying the child for nine months is a severe penalty for allowing herself to get pregnant while being blind in emotion or lust. The speaker asserts that bringing a child into the world is like introducing a "shrieking, screeching thing" and that parents must pay the fine, which begins with hospital fees. He argues that it is a crime to bring a new being into the suffering and the "cage that the body is." The minimum parents can do is to provide the best environment to rid the child of all bodily and social identifications. The true duty, or dharma, of parents is to create conditions that enable the child's liberation. This is not a favor but an obligation. Failing to meet this obligation is a "double crime": the first is giving birth, and the second is doing so without the credentials to be worthy parents. Acharya Prashant emphasizes that parents are deeply indebted to the child, not the other way around, and they must clear this debt. He contends that giving birth requires mental maturity, which he claims 99% of the world's population lacks. The 1% who are mentally mature enough, he says, would never want to give birth. Therefore, all instances of baby-making belong to those who should never have been allowed to do so. He concludes that there is a huge social myth around parenthood; people don't beget babies but rather fall for false stories about what a baby is.