Acharya Prashant addresses a question about why childbirth is considered 'good news' in society despite the problem of overpopulation. He begins by stating that this issue does not require any special spiritual education, as the facts and data are clear. The per capita consumption of resources is already at a level where the Earth cannot sustain the existing population. He asks, where will the resources for more people come from? He uses an analogy of a house that can only feed ten people but already has forty, and someone wants to increase the number to seventy. He says one doesn't need spirituality to understand this is wrong; it's a matter of simple mathematics. He explains that unlike a regular house where one might borrow from outside, for planet Earth, there is nowhere else to get resources from. The planet is a closed system, and it is already unable to provide sufficiently for its 8 billion inhabitants. He points out that consumption increases in two ways: first, when existing people consume more, which is termed progress and development, and second, by bringing more consumers into the world. He gives the example of how an average Indian family's electricity consumption has increased tenfold in the last twenty years, which primarily comes from burning finite coal, a process that also releases harmful carbon dioxide. Acharya Prashant argues that a child is not born with its own road, school, air, food, or house. A responsible mother should realize she is not just giving birth to a child but also to a car, which requires resources the Earth lacks. He states that every child is born on the corpses of millions of other beings because their existence necessitates the destruction of forests for roads, farms, and other infrastructure. Therefore, he calls having a child a great act of violence and a crime against humanity and all other species. It is not a personal matter but a social, national, and global issue. He dismisses the idea of colonizing other planets like Mars as a childish fantasy, highlighting the immense resources and insurmountable challenges involved. He further explains that a major accident has occurred in countries like India, where the population is becoming progressively younger. This demographic shift means that the immature mindset of the 15-25 age group now dominates culture, politics, and the economy. Marketers, politicians, and media all target this demographic, leading to the prevalence of immature ideas. He contrasts the mature-looking actors of the 1960s and 70s with the boyish-looking actors of today, seeing it as a reflection of this cultural shift towards immaturity. He concludes that this has resulted in a weak generation, as they are not receiving a proper education in life values and spirituality, and are not being disciplined by life's hardships due to overprotective parents. This, combined with the influence of the internet, is creating a very weak and vulnerable generation.