Acharya Prashant responds to a question about religious conversions by stating that it is a matter of shame. He suggests that instead of blaming external factors like propaganda or funding, one must first question the weakness within their own community. He asks, if you are ninety percent, how did you get converted and become ten percent? The finger should be pointed at oneself first. He explains that Dharma is like a mother who gives birth to one's truth, and a truly religious person would not abandon it even with a sword to their neck. Those who convert so easily were never truly religious in the first place; they were religious only by name. A religious person would rather die than leave their Dharma. Therefore, no real conversion has occurred, as they had already abandoned their religion internally. The solution, he explains, is not to cry about conversion but to first make people truly religious and instill in them a love for Dharma. He points out that conversions are most prevalent in India because followers of Sanatana Dharma themselves know little about their own religion. He gives the example of Hindu girls who convert for marriage, stating they do so because they lack a real connection to their religion and are easily swayed by money or physical attraction. Their first love should be Dharma, but it is not. The problem is the lack of love for Dharma; conversion is a secondary issue. Acharya Prashant broadens the definition of conversion, arguing that the youth are already converted to an irreligious, consumerist lifestyle. He observes that in places like Rishikesh, young people are more interested in cafes and social media than in ashrams and temples, which are in a state of ruin. He asserts that these individuals are already irreligious, and their formal conversion is merely the final rite for a religiosity that was already dead. He calls this process a "silent murder" of religiosity, perpetrated by the community itself. He provides specific examples of this cultural and religious erosion, such as the westernization of traditional Indian names (e.g., Savitri to Savvy, Jagdamba to Jaggy), which he calls a "de-religionization" of the name itself. He criticizes an education system that, out of greed for money, prioritizes subjects like coding over the Upanishads and one's own language. He also laments the trivialized, westernized portrayal of Indian epics. He concludes by saying that people are shedding crocodile tears because they themselves have snatched religion from their children, and the cancer of irreligion has already spread from head to toe.