Acharya Prashant explains that there is no fundamental difference between the path of knowledge and the path of action; the distinction lies in the perspective and level of the seeker. A person focused on conduct and daily routines follows the path of action, using their deeds as a primary indicator of progress. This path is considered grosser because it relies on visible actions and external behavior. In contrast, the path of knowledge is the subtlest path, where the seeker is concerned with the source of action rather than the action itself. The knowledge seeker remains centered on the point from which life is operated, prioritizing the quality of the mind over external deeds. He notes that while the path of action is suitable for the general public who may not have the keenness to look deep into their minds, it often becomes a matter of mere disciplined conduct. While it is possible for right conduct to eventually purify the mind, it is not a certainty. However, when true knowledge or awakening arises, it is impossible for one's conduct not to change. Knowledge is complete in itself, and if one possesses realization, the resulting actions will naturally be right. The speaker warns that if action does not lead to inner illumination, it becomes a futile cycle. Referring to the Samkhya philosophy, Acharya Prashant clarifies that all actions belong to the realm of Nature, whereas the true nature of the Self is awareness. Therefore, the path of knowledge is closer to one's essential being. He emphasizes that the ultimate goal of the path of action is also to awaken knowledge. Once realization is achieved, one need not worry about action, as the deeds flowing from such a state are its sweet fruits. The focus should always be on whether conduct is leading to an internal awakening rather than just following a set of rules.